4.5 Article

Using genome-wide complex trait analysis to quantify 'missing heritability' in Parkinson's disease

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 21, Issue 22, Pages 4996-5009

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/dds335

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIEHS
  2. NHGRI of the National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services [Z01-AG000949-02, Z01-ES101986]
  3. US Department of Defense [W81XWH-09-2-0128]
  4. National Institutes of Health [NS057105, RR024992]
  5. American Parkinson Disease Association (APDA)
  6. Barnes Jewish Hospital Foundation
  7. Greater St Louis Chapter of the APDA
  8. Hersenstichting Nederland
  9. Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam
  10. Prinses Beatrix Fonds
  11. section of medical genomics
  12. Forschungszentrum fur Umwelt und Gesundheit
  13. German Federal Ministry of Education, Science, Research, and Technology
  14. State of Bavaria
  15. German National Genome Network (NGFNplus) [01GS08134]
  16. German Ministry for Education and Research
  17. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [NGFN 01GR0468, PopGen]
  18. ERA-NET NEURON [01EW0908]
  19. Helmholtz Alliance Mental Health in an Ageing Society [HA-215]
  20. Helmholtz Association
  21. French National Agency of Research [ANR-08-MNP-012]
  22. Michael J. Fox Foundation
  23. Landspitali University Hospital
  24. Icelandic Research Council
  25. European Community [PIAP-GA-2008-230596]
  26. Wellcome Trust [083948/Z/07/Z]
  27. Medical Research Council
  28. Wellcome Trust disease centre [WT089698/Z/09/Z]
  29. Parkinson's UK [8047, J-0804]
  30. Medical Research Council [G0700943]
  31. Department of Health's National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres
  32. Wellcome Trust/Medical Research Council Joint Call in Neurodegeneration award [WT089698]
  33. France Parkinson Association
  34. MRC [G0701075, G0700943, G0901254, G1100479, MC_PC_09003, MC_G1000735, G1100643, G0802462, MC_G0901330] Funding Source: UKRI
  35. Alzheimers Research UK [ART-PG2010-1, ART-PPG2011A-14] Funding Source: researchfish
  36. Medical Research Council [G0801418B, G1100643, MC_G1000735, G0802462, MC_G0901330, MC_PC_09003, G1100479, G0701075, G0901254, G0700943] Funding Source: researchfish
  37. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0507-10376] Funding Source: researchfish
  38. Parkinson's UK [J-0804, G-1107, G-0909, J-0901] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been successful at identifying single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) highly associated with common traits; however, a great deal of the heritable variation associated with common traits remains unaccounted for within the genome. Genome-wide complex trait analysis (GCTA) is a statistical method that applies a linear mixed model to estimate phenotypic variance of complex traits explained by genome-wide SNPs, including those not associated with the trait in a GWAS. We applied GCTA to 8 cohorts containing 7096 case and 19 455 control individuals of European ancestry in order to examine the missing heritability present in Parkinsons disease (PD). We meta-analyzed our initial results to produce robust heritability estimates for PD types across cohorts. Our results identify 27 (95 CI 1738, P 8.08E 08) phenotypic variance associated with all types of PD, 15 (95 CI 0.2 to 33, P 0.09) phenotypic variance associated with early-onset PD and 31 (95 CI 1744, P 1.34E 05) phenotypic variance associated with late-onset PD. This is a substantial increase from the genetic variance identified by top GWAS hits alone (between 3 and 5) and indicates there are substantially more risk loci to be identified. Our results suggest that although GWASs are a useful tool in identifying the most common variants associated with complex disease, a great deal of common variants of small effect remain to be discovered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available