4.5 Article

OLIG2 over-expression impairs proliferation of human Down syndrome neural progenitors

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 2330-2340

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/dds052

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NINDS [1R01NS063997]
  2. NICHD [1R21HD054347]
  3. Harvard Neurodiscovery Center
  4. Doris Duke Clinical Scientist Development Award
  5. Alzheimer's Association New Investigator

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mental retardation and early Alzheimers disease (AD) have generally been attributed to progressive neuronal loss in the developing and mature Down syndrome (DS) brain. However, reduced neuronal production during development could also contribute to the smaller brain size and simplified gyral patterning seen in this disorder. Here, we show impairments in proliferation within the ventricular zone (VZ) of early DS fetal cortex and in cultured early passage DS human neural progenitors (HNPs). We find that the reduced proliferative rates correspond temporally with increased expression of the chromosome 21 (HSA21) associated, oligodendrocyte transcription factor OLIG2 at 1418 weeks gestational age (GA) (period of neurogenesis). Moreover, the DS HNPs adopt more oligodendrocyte-specific features including increased oligodendrocyte marker expression, as well as a reduction in KCNA3 potassium channel expression and function. We further show that OLIG2 inhibition or over-expression regulates potassium channel expression levels and that activation or inhibition of these channels influences the rate of progenitor proliferation. Finally, neural progenitors from Olig2 over-expressing transgenic mice exhibit these same impairments in proliferation and potassium channel expression. These findings suggest that OLIG2 over-expression inhibits neural progenitor proliferation through changes in potassium channel activity, thereby contributing to the reduced neuronal numbers and brain size in DS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available