4.5 Article

Associations of common variants at 1p11.2 and 14q24.1 (RAD51L1) with breast cancer risk and heterogeneity by tumor subtype: findings from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 20, Issue 23, Pages 4693-4706

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddr368

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK [C1287/A12014, C490/A1102, C8197/A10123, C490/A10119, C490/A11020, C1287/A10118, C8197/A10865]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) [145604]
  3. NIH [CA102740-01A2]
  4. United States National Cancer Institute, NIH through Breast Cancer Family Registry and principal investigators Cancer Care Ontario [CA-95-011, CA69467]
  5. Columbia University [CA69398]
  6. Fox Chase Cancer Center [CA69631]
  7. Huntsman Cancer Institute [CA69446]
  8. Northern California Cancer Center [CA69417, U01 CA69417]
  9. University of Melbourne [CA69638, U01 CA69638]
  10. Victorian Government through Victorian Cancer Agency
  11. Victorian Breast Cancer Research Consortium
  12. Dutch Cancer Society [NKI 2001-2423
  13. 2007-3839, DDHK 2004-3124]
  14. Dutch National Genomics Initiative
  15. ELAN
  16. University of Erlangen
  17. Cancer Research UK
  18. Breakthrough Breast Cancer
  19. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  20. National Cancer Research Network (NCRN)
  21. Dietmar-Hopp Foundation
  22. Helmholtz Society
  23. Chief Physician Johan Boserup and Lise Boserup Fund
  24. Danish Medical Research Council
  25. Herlev Hospital
  26. Genome Spain Foundation
  27. Red Tematica de Investigacion Cooperativa en Cancer
  28. Asociacion Espanola Contra Cancer
  29. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitario [PI081120, PI081583]
  30. Medical Research Council (UK)
  31. German Human Genome Project
  32. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Germany [01KW9975/5, 01KW9976/8, 01KW9977/0, 01KW0114]
  33. Robert Bosch Foundation of Medical Research, Stuttgart, Germany
  34. Deutsche Krebshilfe e. V. [70492]
  35. GESBC genotyping in part by the state of Baden-Wurttemberg through the Medical Faculty of the University of Ulm [P.685]
  36. Hannover Medical School
  37. German Research Foundation [DFG] [Do761/2-1]
  38. Helsinki University
  39. Academy of Finland [132473, 127220]
  40. Finnish Cancer Society
  41. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  42. German Federal Ministry of Research and Education [RUS08/017]
  43. Swedish Cancer Society
  44. Stockholm Cancer Society
  45. Gustav V Jubilee Foundation
  46. Bert von Kantzow Foundation
  47. NHMRC [145684, 288704, 454508, 209057, 251533, 396414, 504711, 504715]
  48. National Breast Cancer Foundation
  49. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
  50. Queensland Cancer Fund
  51. Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia
  52. Cancer Foundation of Western Australia
  53. EVO [5654113, 5501, 100449]
  54. Stichting tegen Kanker [232-2008]
  55. FWO
  56. Ministero della Salute
  57. Ministero dell'Universita' e Ricerca [RBLAO3-BETH]
  58. Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
  59. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro [4017]
  60. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA122340, R01-CA63464, R37-CA54281]
  61. NCI [P50 CA116201]
  62. Cancer Council Victoria
  63. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  64. Normal and Carol Stone Genetics Research Fund
  65. Robert, the Robert and Kate Niehaus Clinical Genetics Initiative
  66. Lymphoma Foundation
  67. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [RFA-CA-06-503, CA-06-503]
  68. Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR)
  69. Principal Investigators, including Cancer Care Ontario [U01 CA69467]
  70. Cancer Prevention Institute of California (formerly the Northern California Cancer Center) [U01 CA69417]
  71. Finnish Cancer Foundation
  72. Academy of Finland
  73. University of Oulu
  74. Oulu University Hospital
  75. Cancer Care Ontario
  76. National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, USA
  77. Agency for Science, Technology and Research of Singapore (A*STAR)
  78. US National Institute of Health (NIH)
  79. Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
  80. Breast Cancer Campaign and Yorkshire Cancer Research
  81. NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  82. Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre
  83. Polish Foundation of Science
  84. National Cancer Institute Thailand
  85. Institute of Biomedical Sciences
  86. Academia Sinica
  87. National Sciences Council
  88. Taiwan Biobank
  89. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute [CA-58860]
  90. Lon V Smith Foundation [LVS-39420]
  91. Massachusetts [R01CA47305]
  92. Wisconsin [R01 CA47147]
  93. New Hampshire [R01CA69664]
  94. [PBZ_KBN_122/P05/2004]
  95. MRC [G0700491] Funding Source: UKRI
  96. Cancer Research UK [10118, 11022] Funding Source: researchfish
  97. Cancer Research UK
  98. The Francis Crick Institute [10124] Funding Source: researchfish
  99. Medical Research Council [G0700491] Funding Source: researchfish
  100. National Institute for Health Research [03/DHCS/03/G121/51] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at 1p11.2 and 14q24.1 (RAD51L1) as breast cancer susceptibility loci. The initial GWAS suggested stronger effects for both loci for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors. Using data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), we sought to determine whether risks differ by ER, progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), grade, node status, tumor size, and ductal or lobular morphology. We genotyped rs11249433 at 1p.11.2, and two highly correlated SNPs rs999737 and rs10483813 (r(2) = 0.98) at 14q24.1 (RAD51L1), for up to 46 036 invasive breast cancer cases and 46 930 controls from 39 studies. Analyses by tumor characteristics focused on subjects reporting to be white women of European ancestry and were based on 25 458 cases, of which 87% had ER data. The SNP at 1p11.2 showed significantly stronger associations with ER-positive tumors [per-allele odds ratio (OR) for ER-positive tumors was 1.13, 95% CI = 1.10-1.16 and, for ER-negative tumors, OR was 1.03, 95% CI = 0.98-1.07, case-only P-heterogeneity = 7.6 x 10 25]. The association with ER-positive tumors was stronger for tumors of lower grade (case-only P = 6.7 x 10 23) and lobular histology (case-only P = 0.01). SNPs at 14q24.1 were associated with risk for most tumor subtypes evaluated, including triple-negative breast cancers, which has not been described previously. Our results underscore the need for large pooling efforts with tumor pathology data to help refine risk estimates for SNP associations with susceptibility to different subtypes of breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available