4.5 Article

Gene therapy rescues cone function in congenital achromatopsia

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 19, Issue 13, Pages 2581-2593

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddq136

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Florida
  2. National Institutes of Health [K12-EY015398, R01-EY019304, R01-EY013132, R01-EY006855, T32-EY007132, P30-EY008571, R01-EY011123, R01-EY017549, P30-EY001583]
  3. Foundation Fighting Blindness
  4. Macula Vision Research Foundation
  5. McCabe Fund
  6. ONCE International Prize
  7. Van Sloun Fund for Canine Genetic Research
  8. Hope for Vision

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The successful restoration of visual function with recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV)-mediated gene replacement therapy in animals and humans with an inherited disease of the retinal pigment epithelium has ushered in a new era of retinal therapeutics. For many retinal disorders, however, targeting of therapeutic vectors to mutant rods and/or cones will be required. In this study, the primary cone photoreceptor disorder achromatopsia served as the ideal translational model to develop gene therapy directed to cone photoreceptors. We demonstrate that rAAV-mediated gene replacement therapy with different forms of the human red cone opsin promoter led to the restoration of cone function and day vision in two canine models of CNGB3 achromatopsia, a neuronal channelopathy that is the most common form of achromatopsia in man. The robustness and stability of the observed treatment effect was mutation independent, but promoter and age dependent. Subretinal administration of rAAV5-hCNGB3 with a long version of the red cone opsin promoter in younger animals led to a stable therapeutic effect for at least 33 months. Our results hold promise for future clinical trials of cone-directed gene therapy in achromatopsia and other cone-specific disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available