4.2 Article

Investigation of gene-gene interactions between CD40 and CD40L in Polish multiple sclerosis patients

Journal

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 8, Pages 796-801

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2014.05.013

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; CD40; CD40L; Gene-gene interactions

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Centre Poland [2012/05/N/NZ6/03426]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CD40-CD40L interaction is necessary for the activation of both humoral and cellular immune response and has been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Therefore, we analyzed the combined influence of the CD40 and CD40L variants on MS susceptibility and progression on well-defined Polish population. Our investigation revealed that CT individuals in rs1883832 locus of CD40 possessed almost 1.5-fold higher risk for MS than CC individuals (OR = 1.44; 95%CI = 1.03-2.1; p = 0.032), while this risk for TT individuals was almost 2.5-fold higher (OR = 2.36; 95%CI = 1.19-4.78; p = 0.014). Moreover, for the first time, we observed the association of CD40 gene with MS development and progression. We observed that for the rs1883832CC individuals the age at diagnosis was on average 2 years lower than for the rs1883832CT and rs1883832TT individuals (CI95% = -3.69 - (-0.29); p = 0.023). Additionally, we detected that individuals with TT and CT genotypes showed lower risk of developing secondary progressive course in comparison to those with CC genotype. For rs1883832TT individuals this risk was 4-fold lower (HR = 0.24; CI95% = 0.10-0.53; p = 0.00062). Despite the fact that CD40-CD40L pathway plays a key role in development of autoimmune diseases, we were not able to detect gene-gene interactions between CD40 and CD40L polymorphisms associated with multiple sclerosis. (C) 2014 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available