4.2 Article

Deposition of the lectin pathway of complement in renal biopsies of lupus nephritis patients

Journal

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 8, Pages 907-910

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2013.04.030

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/aims: Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most serious manifestations of SLE occurring in 66-90% of these patients. The complement system is part of the innate immunity and modulator of inflammation and the adaptative immune response. Mannan-binding lectin (MBL) and Ficolin-2 (FCN-2) are important members of the lectin pathway of complement activation. Despite the significant participation of complement in the pathogenesis of the LN, there are few reports demonstrating in situ deposition of complement components in renal biopsy specimens in this disorder. The present study investigated the deposition of complement components in kidney specimens of LN patients. Methods: Renal biopsies of 11 patients with SLE and LN were evaluated for immunofluorescence staining for IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, and C1q. Additionally, MBL, FCN-2 and C5b-9 were researched using monoclonal antibodies. Results: All the biopsies were positive for IgG, C3, and Clq, eight were positive IgM and five had IgA deposition in glomerular tissue. The terminal complex of complement C5b9 was positive in all cases, MBL in nine (82%) cases; seven (63.6%) of them presenting concomitantly FCN-2 deposition. Patients presenting MBL deposition had higher mean of urinary proteins (9.0 g/day) than patients with negative MBL deposition (mean of 2.3 g/day). Conclusions: In this study, we demonstrated in situ the participation of complement in the renal injury, including MBL and FCN-2 of the lectin pathway; also the strong role of C5b-9 in the pathogenesis of LN. (C) 2013 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available