4.2 Article

Definitions of histocompatibility typing terms: Harmonization of Histocompatibility Typing Terms Working Group

Journal

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 72, Issue 12, Pages 1214-1216

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2011.06.002

Keywords

HLA typing resolution; HLA matching; Verification typing; Extended typing

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Histocompatibility testing for stem cell and solid organ transplantation has become increasingly complex as newly discovered human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles are described. HLA typing assignments reported by laboratories are used by physicians and donor registries for matching donors and recipients. To communicate effectively, a common language for histocompatibility terms should be established. In early 2010, representatives from clinical, registry, and histocompatibility organizations joined together as the Harmonization of Histocompatibility Typing Terms Working Group to define a consensual language for laboratories, physicians and registries to communicate histocompatibility typing information. The Working Group defined terms for HLA typing resolution. HLA matching and a format for reporting HLA assignments. In addition, definitions of verification typing and extended typing were addressed. The original draft of the Definitions of Histocompatibility Typing Terms was disseminated to colleagues from each organization to gain feedback and create a collaborative document. Commentary gathered during this 90-day review period were discussed and implemented for preparation of this report. Histocompatibility testing continues to evolve thus, the definitions agreed upon today, likely will require refinement and perhaps additional terminology in the future. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. (C) 2011 American Society of Hematology and American society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available