4.0 Article

Association Tests for X-Chromosomal Markers - A Comparison of Different Test Statistics

Journal

HUMAN HEREDITY
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages 23-36

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000323768

Keywords

Crohn's disease; Genetic association; Genome-wide association; Sex specific; X chromosome

Funding

  1. NIDDK
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KO 2250/4-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Genome-wide association studies have successfully elucidated the genetic background of complex diseases, but X chromosomal data have usually not been analyzed. A reason for this is that there is no consensus approach for the analysis taking into account the specific features of X chromosomal data. This contribution evaluates test statistics proposed for X chromosomal markers regarding type I error frequencies and power. Methods: We performed extensive simulation studies covering a wide range of different settings. Besides characteristics of the general population, we investigated sex-balanced or unbalanced sampling procedures as well as sex-specific effect sizes, allele frequencies and prevalence. Finally, we applied the test statistics to an association data set on Crohn's disease. Results: Simulation results imply that in addition to standard quality control, sex-specific allele frequencies should be checked to control for type I errors. Furthermore, we observed distinct differences in power between test statistics which are determined by sampling design and sex specificity of effect sizes. Analysis of the Crohn's disease data detects two previously unknown genetic regions on the X chromosome. Conclusion: Although no test is uniformly most powerful under all settings, recommendations are offered as to which test performs best under certain conditions. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available