4.6 Review

Multiplexed assays of variant effects contribute to a growing genotype-phenotype atlas

Journal

HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 137, Issue 9, Pages 665-678

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-018-1916-x

Keywords

Deep mutational scanning; MAVE; Variant effect; VUS; Variants of uncertain significance

Funding

  1. One Brave Idea Initiative
  2. National Human Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH/NHGRI) Center of Excellence in Genomic Science (CEGS) Initiative [HG004233]
  3. Canadian Excellence Research Chairs (CERC) Program
  4. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation (MRI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Given the constantly improving cost and speed of genome sequencing, it is reasonable to expect that personal genomes will soon be known for many millions of humans. This stands in stark contrast with our limited ability to interpret the sequence variants which we find. Although it is, perhaps, easiest to interpret variants in coding regions, knowledge of functional impact is unknown for the vast majority of missense variants. While many computational approaches can predict the impact of coding variants, they are given a little weight in the current guidelines for interpreting clinical variants. Laboratory assays produce comparatively more trustworthy results, but until recently did not scale to the space of all possible mutations. The development of deep mutational scanning and other multiplexed assays of variant effect has now brought feasibility of this endeavour within view. Here, we review progress in this field over the last decade, break down the different approaches into their components, and compare methodological differences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available