4.6 Article

Genetic variation in CYP17 and endometrial cancer risk

Journal

HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages 155-162

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-007-0454-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic variation in CYP17 is suspected to be related to endometrial cancer risk based on its role in the regulation of steroid and non-steroid hormone biosynthesis. Reported associations between CYP17 and higher levels of estradiol in some studies suggest that the C allele of a T-to-C single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the 5'UTR of CYP17 (rs743572) may be associated with an increased risk of hormone-related cancers. However, five relatively small epidemiologic studies of endometrial cancer have reported that women with the rs743572 C allele have a decreased risk of endometrial cancer. To examine this association, we genotyped rs743572 and eight other haplotype-tagging SNPs (htSNPs), which are estimated to capture > 80% of the variation in CYP17 in a population-based study of 497 endometrial cancer cases and 1,024 controls in Poland. Significant associations were not found for rs743572 (per C allele: OR = 1.12, 95%CI 0.96-1.30; P-trend = 0.15), for individual htSNPs, or for extended haplotypes (global P-value = 0.60). When we pooled data from previously published studies with our own (a total of 1,004 endometrial cases and 1,907 controls), we observed significant study heterogeneity in summary estimates of the association between rs743572 and endometrial cancer, as well as evidence of publication bias. In conclusion, our data are not consistent with a decreased endometrial cancer risk associated with rs743572, as previously reported, or with other haplotype-tagging polymorphisms. Further evaluation in consortia is necessary to confirm potential weak associations between common variation in CYP17 and endometrial cancer risk and to address the concern of publication bias.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available