4.7 Article

Increased cortical thickness in a frontoparietal network in social anxiety disorder

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 2966-2977

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22378

Keywords

dorsal attention network; emotion processing; amygdale; hippocampus; DLPFC; anxiety disorders; MRI; anatomy; insula; anterior cingulate

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [32003B_120518]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [32003B_120518] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is the second leading anxiety disorder. On the functional neurobiological level, specific brain regions involved in the processing of anxiety-laden stimuli and in emotion regulation have been shown to be hyperactive and hyper-responsive in SAD such as amygdala, insula and orbito- and prefrontal cortex. On the level of brain structure, prior studies on anatomical differences in SAD resulted in mixed and partially contradictory findings. Based on previous functional and anatomical models of SAD, this study examined cortical thickness in structural magnetic resonance imaging data of 46 patients with SAD without comorbidities (except for depressed episode in one patient) compared with 46 matched healthy controls in a region of interest-analysis and in whole-brain. In a theory-driven ROI-analysis, cortical thickness was increased in SAD in left insula, right anterior cingulate and right temporal pole. Furthermore, the whole-brain analysis revealed increased thickness in right dorsolateral prefrontal and right parietal cortex. This study detected no regions of decreased cortical thickness or brain volume in SAD. From the perspective of brain networks, these findings are in line with prior functional differences in salience networks and frontoparietal networks associated with executive-controlling and attentional functions. Hum Brain Mapp 35:2966-2977, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available