4.7 Article

Predicting effective connectivity from resting-state networks in healthy elderly and patients with prodromal Alzheimer's disease

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 954-963

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22226

Keywords

prodromal Alzheimer's disease; effective connectivity; resting-state functional connectivity; executive attention network

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01EV0710]
  2. Kommission fur Klinische Forschung of the university hospital Klinikum Rechts der Isar [C21-09/8762753]
  3. Alzheimer Forschung Initiative (AFI) [08860, 8762754]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using functional neuroimaging techniques two aspects of functional integration in the human brain have been investigated, functional connectivity and effective connectivity. In this study we examined both connectivity types in parallel within an executive attention network during rest and while performing an attention task. We analyzed the predictive value of resting-state functional connectivity on task-induced effective connectivity in patients with prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD) and healthy elderly. We found that in healthy elderly, functional connectivity was a significant predictor for effective connectivity, however, it was frequency-specific. Effective top-down connectivity emerging from prefrontal areas was related with higher frequencies of functional connectivity (e.g., 0.08-0.15 Hz), in contrast to effective bottom-up connectivity going to prefrontal areas, which was related to lower frequencies of functional connectivity (e.g., 0.001-0.03 Hz). In patients, the prediction of effective connectivity by functional connectivity was disturbed. We conclude that functional connectivity and effective connectivity are interrelated in healthy brains but this relationship is aberrant in very early AD. Hum Brain Mapp 35:954-963, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available