4.7 Article

Semiblind Spatial ICA of fMRI Using Spatial Constraints

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 31, Issue 7, Pages 1076-1088

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20919

Keywords

fMRI analysis; spatial ICA; semiblind ICA; constrained ICA; spatial constraints; fixed-point learning

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60402013, 60971097]
  2. Liaoning Province Natural Science Foundation of China [20062174]
  3. National Institutes of Health [1 R01 EB 000840, 1 R01 EB 005846]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Independent component analysis (ICA) utilizing prior information, also called semiblind ICA, has demonstrated considerable promise in the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). So far, temporal information about fMRI has been used in temporal ICA or spatial ICA as additional constraints to improve estimation of task-related components. Considering that prior information about spatial patterns is also available, a semiblind spatial ICA algorithm utilizing the spatial information was proposed within the framework of constrained ICA with fixed-point learning. The proposed approach was first tested with synthetic fMRI-like data, and then was applied to real fMRI data from 11 subjects performing a visuomotor task. Three components of interest including two task-related components and the default mode component were automatically extracted, and atlas-defined masks were used as the spatial constraints. The default mode network, a set of regions that appear correlated in particular in the absence of tasks or external stimuli and is of increasing interest in fMRI studies, was found to be greatly improved when incorporating spatial prior information. Results from simulation and real fMRI data demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can improve ICA performance compared to a different semiblind ICA algorithm and a standard blind ICA algorithm. Hum Brain Mapp 31:1076-1088,2010. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available