4.7 Article

STN-Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease Restores Striatal Inhibition of Thalamocortical Projection

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 112-121

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20486

Keywords

Parkinson; STN-stimulation; PET; flow; VL; thalamus; deactivation; basalgangglia loop; clinical outcome

Funding

  1. Danish Parkinson Association
  2. Augustinus Foundation
  3. GlaxoSmithKline A/S (Denmark)
  4. Orion Pharma
  5. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  6. Institute of Experimental Clinical Research of the University of Aarhus
  7. Medical Research Council of Denmark
  8. Danish National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To test the hypothesis that deep train stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) restores the inhibitory output to the striatothalamocortical loop in Parkinson's disease, we obtained functional brain images of blood flow in 10 STN-stimulated patients with Parkinson's disease. Patients were immobile and off antiparkinsonian medication for 12 h. They were scanned with and without bilateral STN-stimulation with a 4-h interval between the two conditions. The order of DBS stimulation (ON or OFF) was randomized. Stimulation significantly raised regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) bilaterally in the STN and in the left nucleus lentiformis. Conversely, flow declined in the left supplementary motor area (BA 6), ventrolateral nucleus of the left thalamus, and right cerebellum. Activation of the basal ganglia and deactivation of supplementary motor area and thalamus were both correlated with the improvement of motor function. The result is consistent with the explanation that stimulation in resting patients raises output from the STN with activation of the inhibitory basal ganglia output nuclei and subsequent deactivation of the thalamic anteroventral and ventrolateral nuclei and the supplementary motor area. Hum Brain Mapp 30:112-121, 2009. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss. Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available