4.5 Article

Prognostic Indicators in Well-Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma When Controlling for Stage and Treatment

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages 1021-1027

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/lary.25017

Keywords

Thyroid carcinoma; outcomes; survival; race

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives/HypothesisThe incidence of thyroid carcinoma is rising. Few studies have examined patient characteristics that influence survival when adjusting for treatment and tumor stage/extent. Study DesignRetrospective analysis was performed using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registry data among patients diagnosed with well-differentiated thyroid (WDT) carcinoma during 1988-2009. MethodsKaplan-Meir survival curves were used to estimate 5- and 10-year cause-specific and overall survival differences by sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsA total of 83,985 patients were identified with WDT carcinoma. Blacks had higher hazard of death at 5 years (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.42-1.96) and 10 years (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.37-1.80) when compared to Caucasians, but there were no significant differences in cause-specific deaths. Hispanics had higher overall and cause-specific 5-year and 10-year hazard of death (5-year cause-specific: HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.23-1.99). Age was the most significant predictor of cause-specific and overall survival, with risk increasing in a nonlinear fashion. After age 45 years, the HR for 5- and 10-year cause-specific survival rose drastically, reaching an HR of 153 for individuals aged 85 years and older (HR, 153.45; 95% CI, 97.84-240.67). ConclusionsAge was the strongest factor associated with WDT cancer in our study. African Americans had worse overall survival, although only Hispanics had a significantly worse cause-specific survival. These factors should be taken into account in counseling patients and treatment planning. Level of Evidence2c. Laryngoscope, 125:1021-1027, 2015

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available