4.5 Article

Conceptual Ecological Model of the Chiquibul/Maya Mountain Massif, Belize

Journal

HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 317-340

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2012.685809

Keywords

conservation management; ecological indicators; ecosystem attributes; environmental stressors; landscape model; Maya Mountains

Funding

  1. Friends for Conservation and Development
  2. Belize Foundation for Research and Environmental Education
  3. University of Florida

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Chiquibul/Maya Mountain Massif (CM3) is an approximately 1.25 million-acre area in southwestern Belize and is among the most intact tropical forests north of the Amazon. The CM3 has a variety of habitats that contribute to its valuable environmental services and high aesthetic value, but despite its protected area status, the CM3 is under increasing pressure from extraction of natural and cultural resources as a result of transboundary incursions on the western border and increased land-use changes from industrial activities that include agriculture, hydropower development, logging, and mining. Conceptual ecological models (CEM) are effective planning tools for organizing existing information about natural systems for determining gaps in knowledge and research priorities, and for developing objectives and measures of success for management and monitoring programs. The CEM of the CM3 describe ecological relationships among major stressors and attributes of the system and presents performance measures to quantify potential change to attributes. Attributes were derived from defining characteristics of the massif and chosen as valuable ecological and cultural components of the massif. Ecological linkages between stressors and attributes highlight priorities for conservation, management, and research that will ensure continued protection of the CM3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available