4.3 Article

Impairment of mice spermatogenesis by sodium arsenite

Journal

HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 290-302

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0960327111405862

Keywords

arsenic; spermatogenesis; histopathology; oxidative stress; recovery

Categories

Funding

  1. CICECO
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (Portuguese Government) [PTDC/AMB/70431/2006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to assess the effect of arsenic on the male reproductive impairment in mice, 7-week-old animals were exposed to 7.5 mg sodium arsenite (NaAsO2)/kg body weight, during 35 days (one spermatogenic cycle). One group of animals was sacrificed after exposure, while another group received distilled water for an additional period of 35 days, in order to study the spermatoxic effect and the recovery of spermatogenesis. In mice sacrificed after NaAsO2 exposure, a decrease in testis/body weight ratio and reduction of tubular diameter were observed. Both groups of NaAsO2-exposed animals showed remarkable histopathological changes, such as sloughing of immature germ cells. Animals sacrificed after NaAsO2 exposure showed decreased sperm motility, increased abnormal sperm morphology and decreased sperm viability. The effects of NaAsO2 on sperm motility recovered to normal values after one spermatogenic cycle, while increased sperm abnormality was maintained. However, at this period, a decrease in acrosome integrity was detected. Concerning oxidative stress parameters, animals sacrificed after NaAsO2 exposure showed a decreased selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase activity, which was not detected after the recovery. Conversely, at this period, total glutathione peroxidase activity increased in exposed animals. These results demonstrate the toxic effects of NaAsO2 on mice spermatogenesis and show the lack of recovery after one spermatogenic cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available