4.5 Article

Pediatric nasoseptal flap reconstruction for suprasellar approaches

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 125, Issue 11, Pages 2451-2456

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.25395

Keywords

Nasoseptal flap; endoscopic skull base surgery; skull base reconstruction; pediatric skull base surgery; craniopharyngioma; cerebrospinal fluid leak

Funding

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives/HypothesisTo determine the pediatric age groups viable for nasoseptal flap (NSF) reconstruction of endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to intracranial pathology of suprasella neoplasms. Study DesignRetrospective cohort study. MethodsRetrospective review of 16 pediatric patients who underwent EEA with NSF reconstruction for a suprasellar defect from 2012 to 2014. Radioanatomic analysis was utilized to assess feasibility of NSF reconstruction of suprasellar neoplasms approached via EEA. Computed tomography (CT) measurements for defect size and potential flap coverage were measured by preoperative maxillofacial CT. Radiographic measurements and surgical outcomes were compared to determine if flap size would be sufficient to cover said defects in two pediatric age groups: those >10 years of age (mean age 14 years) and those <10 years (mean age 6 years). ResultsOf all patients encountered in this cohort, one postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak was identified in the >10 years of age population, and this was not due to insufficient flap coverage. Average potential flap length and width are sufficient to cover average suprasellar defect length and width in both age groups (P<.05 in all age groups). ConclusionsPatient selection is critical for successful pediatric EEA. Preoperative radiographic assessment of NSF feasibility is a critical to ensure adequate flap coverage for suprasellar defects. NSF appears to provide a sufficient and reliable coverage option in reconstruction of suprasellar defects in pediatric patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available