4.3 Article

Septo-Optic Dysplasia: Antenatal Risk Factors and Clinical Features in a Regional Study

Journal

HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS
Volume 78, Issue 2, Pages 81-87

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000341148

Keywords

Septo-optic dysplasia; Hypopituitarism; Optic nerve hypoplasia

Funding

  1. UK Child Growth Foundation
  2. Ferring Pharmaceuticals
  3. Pfizer Inc
  4. Sri Lankan government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Septo-optic dysplasia (SOD) is a disorder with postulated environmental and genetic aetiology. This study delineates clinical features and potential perinatal environmental factors along with epidemiology in SOD children. Methods: Assessment of patients with SOD triad features in the UK West Midlands region. Results: Of 227 patients identified between 1998 and 2009 with 1 or more feature of the triad, 55 had midline defects, 149 had optic nerve hypoplasia and 132 had hypopituitarism. Eighty-eight children (52% males; incidence 8.3/ 100,000 live births) had SOD defined as 2 out of 3 features and 21 (24%) had all 3. Sixty-one percent had anterior pituitary deficiency and 21.5% had diabetes insipidus. Median maternal/paternal ages in SOD were 21 and 23.5 years, compared to UK means of 29.3 and 32.4 years (p < 0.001). First trimester bleeding was markedly increased at 12/48 (25%) compared to 0.07% in the UK (p < 0.001). Ethnicity showed a non-significant higher prevalence in AfroCaribbean and mixed race groups, and significantly lower prevalence (p = 0.004) in South Asian groups compared to West Midland and Birmingham city data: 8% versus 2.5 and 6.7%, 9% versus 1.8 and 3.2% and 3% versus 8.4 and 21%, respectively. Conclusions: SOD is associated with younger maternal and paternal age, primigravida births and ethnic differences. Increased first trimester bleeding may indicate that SOD is a vascular disruption sequence. Copyright (c) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available