4.3 Article

Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents with Growth Hormone Deficiency: Association with Growth Hormone Treatment

Journal

HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS
Volume 78, Issue 2, Pages 94-99

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000341151

Keywords

Quality of life; Overweight; Short stature; Growth hormone; Treatment; Children; Adolescents

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Research [01EL619]
  2. Novo Nordisk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Quality of life (QoL) as it is related with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is a matter of controversy. Methods: We analyzed QoL in 95 children aged 8-18 years with isolated GHD (72% male) treated with growth hormone (GH). These children were compared to 190 age- and gender-matched healthy children with similar height [height < 10th percentile; control group 1 (CG1)] and age- and gender-matched 285 healthy children of normal stature (control group 2: CG2). QoL was measured by the KINDL (R) questionnaire referring to six domains (physical well-being, emotional well-being, self-esteem, family, friends, and school). Results: QoL was significantly reduced in CG1 (effect-size 0.21) compared to CG2, while QoL was not significantly altered in children with GHD. In multiple linear regression analyses adjusted to age, gender, BMI, migration background, and socioeconomic status, decreasing height-SDS was associated with poorer QoL (especially emotional well-being), and treatment with GH was related significantly to better self-esteem. Increase of height-SDS in children treated with GH was associated positively with QoL and all its subscales except family and school. Conclusions: These findings suggest psychological consequences of short stature in children and an improvement of QoL in children treated with GH with the focus on self-esteem and emotional well-being. Copyright (c) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available