4.2 Article

Different Effects of Aliskiren and Losartan on Fibrinolysis and Insulin Sensitivity in Hypertensive Patients with Metabolic Syndrome

Journal

HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 12, Pages 892-896

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1263123

Keywords

PAI-1 antigen; tPA activity; AT1R blockers; renin inhibition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of aliskiren and losartan on fibrinolysis and insulin sensitivity (IS) in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome. After 2-week placebo period, 76 outpatients with mild to moderate hypertension and metabolic syndrome were randomized to aliskiren 300 mg od or losartan 100 mg od for 12 weeks. Clinic blood pressure (BP), plasma PAI-1 antigen, and tPA activity were evaluated after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. At the end of each treatment period patients performed an euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp and IS was assessed by glucose infusion rate (GIR). Both aliskiren and losartan induced a significant and similar SBP/DBP reduction (-15.6/10.7 mmHg and -15.5/10.5 mmHg, p < 0.001 vs. baseline, respectively). Both drugs decreased PAI-1 antigen and activity after 2 weeks of treatment; subsequently, only the decreasing effect of aliskiren was sustained throughout the 12 weeks [-7.5 ng/ml (-31 %) p < 0.05 vs. baseline], while with losartan PAI-1 increased at week 12 [+ 3.6 ng/ml (+ 15 %), p < 0.05 vs. baseline and p < 0.01 vs. aliskiren)]. The tPA activity showed no significant change with aliskiren and a decrease with losartan [-0.04 IU/ml (-8%), p < 0.05 vs. baseline and p < 0.01 vs. aliskiren]. Aliskiren significantly increased GIR [+ 1.4 mg/min/kg (+ 28 %), p < 0.01 vs. baseline] while losartan did not change it [+ 0.2 mg/min/kg (+ 4 %), NS vs. baseline, p < 0.05 vs. aliskiren)]. These results indicated that in this type of patients, despite similar BP reduction, aliskiren improved the fibrinolytic balance as well as IS, while losartan worsened the fibrinolytic balance and did not affect IS. The clinical relevance of these different effects remains to be clarified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available