4.2 Review

Current Insights into the Pathogenesis of Graves' Orbitopathy

Journal

HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages 456-464

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1220935

Keywords

Graves' orbitopathy; environmental factors; genetic susceptibility; orbital autoantigens; orbital fibroblast; adipogenesis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graves' orbitopathy (GO) is part of an autoimmune disease constellation comprising hyperthyroidism, orbitopathy, pretibial myxedema, and acropachy. Signs and symptoms of GO occur due to inflammation of the orbital connective tissue, inflammation and fibrosis of the extraocular muscles, and adipogenesis. Stimulatory TSH receptor (TSHR) antibodies (TRAb) cause hyperthyroidism, but pathogenetic mechanisms in the orbit are less clear. The TSHR is one of the favoured candidate antigens; others such as the IGF1R might also play a role. Compared with other anatomical locations, orbital fibroblasts are extremely reactive to inflammatory stimuli, especially via CD40 activation. Orbital fibroblasts also differentiate into adipocytes, in response to the prevailing inflammatory cytokine milieu. Consequently TSHR gene expression increases together with expression of adipogenesis related genes. The same genes that confer susceptibility to Graves' disease (GD), both thyroid specific and immunoregulatory, also influence GO, although an increasing number of candidate genes with higher impact on orbitopathy are being identified. Smoking is the only environmental factor known to increase the likelihood and severity of GO developing in GD patients. A robust animal model of GO would facilitate the evaluation of new treatments. To date most models have centered on provoking autoimmune responses to the TSHR, but other antigens, alone or in combination with this receptor, hopefully will succeed in inducing the full spectrum of GD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available