4.2 Article

Mechanisms of the Action of Zoledronic Acid on Human MG-63 Osteosarcoma Cells

Journal

HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 11, Pages 737-745

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1078753

Keywords

MG-63 cells; zoledronic acid; Ras; calcium; estrogen receptors

Funding

  1. Special Research Account, University of Athens
  2. National Council of Health, Ministry of Health, Greece
  3. European Social Fund and National Resources

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of our study was to analyze the action of zoledronic acid on MG-63 human osteosarcoma cells. The proliferation of MG-63 cells was inhibited by either continuous or pulsatile exposures of zoledronic acid in a dose-dependent manner (10-250 mu M). Zoledronic acid did not produce evidence of MG-63 cell death when administered at 100 mM for 48 hours, but only after exposure of 96 hours. Zoledronic acid (100 mu M) increased the distribution of MG-63 cells in G0/G1 phase, however, it did not increase the adriamycin-induced apoptosis. In addition, zoledronic acid action was partially neutralized by exogenous administration of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP), but not by farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP). Furthermore, zoledronic acid resulted in the attenuation of the prenylated form of Ras. Zoledronic acid and EDTA increased fluorescence of Fluo-3 loaded MG-63 cells in a similar pattern. This increase was owing to the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores since zoledronic acid failed to reveal such a change to intracellular Ca2+ when cells were previously treated with 1 mM caffeine. Moreover, zoledronic acid significantly decreased the expression of estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) whereas it did not change significantly the expression of estrogen receptor beta (ER beta) in MG-63 cells. These data Suggest that zoledronic acid can control the proliferation and the differentiation of osteosarcoma-like cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available