4.6 Article

Layer-by-Layer Assembly of Inactivated Poliovirus and N-Trimethyl Chitosan on pH-Sensitive Microneedles for Dermal Vaccination

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 31, Issue 31, Pages 8654-8660

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01262

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this work was to coat pH-sensitive microneedle arrays with inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) particles and N-trimethyl chitosan chloride (TMC) via electrostatic interactions, and assess the immunogenicity of the vaccine after topical application of the coated microneedles in rats. The surface of 200 mu m long microneedles was first chemically modified with pH-sensitive (pyridine) groups and then coated with negatively charged IPV and a positively charged polymer (TMC). To obtain a sufficient high antigen dose, 10 layers of IPV were alternately coated with TMC. The binding of IPV and TMC onto pH-sensitive microneedles was quantified and visualized by using fluorescently labeled TMC and IPV. The release of IPV and TMC from the microneedles was evaluated in ex vivo human skin by fluorescence and the immunogenicity of (unlabeled) IPV was assessed after topical application of the coated microneedles in rats. pH-sensitive microneedles were homogeneously coated with 10 layers of both IPV and TMC, resulting in 45 D antigen units IPV and 700 ng TMC per microneedle array. Fluorescence microscopy imaging revealed that both IPV and TMC were released into ex vivo human skin upon application of the coated microneedles. Finally, in vivo application of IPV-TMC-coated pH-sensitive microneedles in rats led to the induction of IPV specific antibody responses, illustrating that they are practically applicable. Topical administration of pH-sensitive microneedles coated with polyelectrolyte multinanolayers of antigens and oppositely charged polymers may be a useful approach for microneedle-based vaccination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available