4.3 Article

Early rice exploitation in the lower Yangzi valley: What are we missing?

Journal

HOLOCENE
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 613-621

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0959683611424177

Keywords

agriculture; anthropogenesis; China; domestication; early Holocene; food production; foxnut; peach; rice; water chestnut; Yangzi Valley

Funding

  1. Social Sciences Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) [72022345]
  2. University of Toronto Mississauga, Canada
  3. Shandong University, Jinan, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent interpretations of the archaeology of domesticated rice evolution and the development of agriculture in the Lower Yangzi Valley are being informed by new genetic, palaeoenvironmental, archaeological and archaeobotanical data. This paper explores current views on early rice production in the region and attempts to expand the discourse to provoke exploration of new and modified questions. Rice-specific botanical through large-scale ecological issues and causality are examined. This paper argues that understanding rice domestication and production, although important, should not be the exclusive goal of research on early agriculture in the Yangzi Valley. Despite the preliminary nature of the investigations at Kuahuqiao (c. 8000-7000 cal. BP), evidence of resource management, and potential domesticated resources or their ancestors that includes pig (Sus scrofa), peach (Prunus persica), apricot (Pormeniaca), Japanese apricot (P mume), foxnut (Euryale ferox) and water chestnut (Trapa spp.) underscore the need to broaden the scope of inquiry on early food/resource production. The complexities of the archaeological and environmental record in the Yangzi valley indicate that nuanced, complex explanations for rice domestication and agricultural origins rather than deterministic, single cause explanations are necessary in order to move forward.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available