4.1 Article

Serological response to hepatitis B virus vaccine in HIV-infected children in Tanzania

Journal

HIV MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages 519-525

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2008.00598.x

Keywords

HBV immunization; paediatric HIV; Tanzania

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background HIV-infected children have a lower seroconversion rate to hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunization than healthy children. Previous studies have produced conflicting results on CD4 cell counts as predictors of vaccine response. No study has evaluated the response rate to HBV vaccination in HIV-infected children receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Our aim was to vaccinate HIV-infected children living in a close community and to investigate the anamnestic response rate after vaccination with its predictors. Methods Eighty-four HIV-positive children aged 1-10 years who were negative for antibodies to the HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) completed immunization with three doses of 5 mu g HBVAXPRO (Aventis, Milan, Italy). Quantitative testing for antibodies to the HBV surface antigen (anti-HBs) was performed: a seroprotective titre was defined as anti-HBs > 10 mUI/mL. Results After the vaccination, the anti-HBs seroconversion rate was 59.5%. It was higher in individuals in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) immune category 1 than in those in CDC categories 2 and 3. Seroconversion was found in 70.8% of HAART-treated and 44.4% of treatment-naive children. In multivariable models, HAART use and absolute CD4 cell counts were independently associated with probability of seroconversion and with higher anti-HBs titres. Conclusions We found a higher seroconversion rate compared with previous studies in HIV-infected children. In children who are candidates to receive antiretroviral therapy, it may be advisable to defer HBV vaccination until after treatment initiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available