3.9 Article

Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc Versus Efavirenz, Both With Zidovudine/Lamivudine: 96-Week Results From the MERIT Study

Journal

HIV CLINICAL TRIALS
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 127-132

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1310/hct1103-125

Keywords

efavirenz; HIV-1; maraviroc; treatment naive; virologic response

Funding

  1. Pfizer Global Research and Development
  2. Pfizer, Inc.
  3. ViiV Healthcare
  4. Merck Sharp Dohme
  5. Tibotec
  6. Stendhal
  7. Abbott
  8. Gilead
  9. BMS
  10. GlaxoSmithKline
  11. Ardea Biosciences Avexa
  12. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  13. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  14. Pain Therapeutics
  15. Progenics
  16. Tobira Therapeutics
  17. Virxsys

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The MERIT study evaluated maraviroc versus efavirenz, both with zidovudine/lamivudine, in treatment-naive patients with CCR5-tropic (R5) HIV-1. Post hoc analyses previously assessed week 48 outcomes in patients rescreened with R5 virus by a more sensitive tropism assay. Methods: Week 96 efficacy (post hoc, n = 614) and safety (n = 721) were assessed. Results: Proportions of subjects <50 copies/mL (58.8% maraviroc, 62.7% efavirenz) and time to loss of virologic response (TLOVR) responders (<50 copies/mL: 60.5% vs 60.7%) were similar. Maraviroc recipients had greater CD4 increases (+212 vs+ 171 cells/mm(3)) and fewer adverse event discontinuations (6.1% vs 15.5%), malignancies, and category C events. Conclusion: Week 96 data confirm week 48 observations in MERIT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available