Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas with prominent myxoid stroma: analysis of 56 cases
Stefano Sioletic et al.
HISTOPATHOLOGY (2013)
Diagnostic Utility of p16, CDK4, and MDM2 as an Immunohistochemical Panel in Distinguishing Well-differentiated and Dedifferentiated Liposarcomas From Other Adipocytic Tumors
Khin Thway et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2012)
Liposarcomas With Mixed Well-differentiated and Pleomorphic Features: A Clinicopathologic Study of 12 Cases
Jennifer M. Boland et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2010)
Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma With Homologous'' Lipoblastic (Pleomorphic Liposarcoma-like) Differentiation: Clinicopathologic and Molecular Analysis of a Series Suggesting Revised Diagnostic Criteria
Adrian Marino-Enriquez et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2010)
Lesson of the Month - Sclerosing poorly differentiated liposarcoma: clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of a distinct morphological subtype of lipomatous tumour of soft tissue
S. Suster et al.
HISTOPATHOLOGY (2008)
HMGA2 is the partner of MDM2 in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas whereas CDK4 belongs to a distinct inconsistent amplicon
Antoine Italiano et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2008)
Atypical lipomatous tumor, its variants, and its combined forms - A study of 61 cases, with a minimum follow-up of 10 years
Harry L. Evans
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2007)
MDM2 and CDK4 immunostainings are useful adjuncts in diagnosing well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma subtypes -: A comparative analysis of 559 soft tissue neoplasms with genetic data
MBN Binh et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2005)
Share Paper
