4.3 Article

In vivo contribution of nestin- and GLAST-lineage cells to adult hippocampal neurogenesis

Journal

HIPPOCAMPUS
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 708-719

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22130

Keywords

subgranular zone; dentate gyrus; genetic fate tracking; radial glial cell; Cre recombinase

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 DA016765, R01 DA016765-07S1, K02 DA023555, R01 NS065195, F31 NS064632, T32 DA007290, NASA NNX07AP84G, NNX12AB55G]
  2. DFG [GO 640 9-1, SFB 870, 596]
  3. BMBF
  4. Fidelity Foundation
  5. Bavarian Ministry for Science
  6. NARSAD
  7. Canadian Institute of Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radial glia-like cells (RGCs) are the hypothesized source of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. However, the current model of hippocampal neurogenesis does not fully incorporate the in vivo heterogeneity of RGCs. In order to better understand the contribution of different RGC subtypes to adult hippocampal neurogenesis, we employed widely used transgenic lines (Nestin-CreER(T2) and GLAST::CreER(T2) mice) to explore how RGCs contribute to neurogenesis under basal conditions and after stimulation and depletion of neural progenitor cells. We first used these inducible fate-tracking transgenic lines to define the similarities and differences in the contribution of nestin-and GLAST-lineage cells to basal long-term hippocampal neurogenesis. We then explored the ability of nestin-and GLAST-lineage RGCs to contribute to neurogenesis after experimental manipulations that either ablate neurogenesis (i.c.v. application of the anti-mitotic AraC, cytosine-beta-D-arabinofuranoside) or stimulate neurogenesis (wheel running). Interestingly, in both ablation and stimulation experiments, labeled RGCs in GLAST:: CreER(T2) mice appear to contribute to neurogenesis, whereas RGCs in Nestin-CreER(T2) mice do not. Finally, using NestinGFP reporter mice, we expanded on previous research by showing that not all RGCs in the adult dentate gyrus subgranular zone express nestin, and therefore RGCs are antigenically heterogeneous. These findings are important for the field, as they allow appropriately conservative interpretation of existing and future data that emerge from these inducible transgenic lines. These findings also raise important questions about the differences between transgenic driver lines, the heterogeneity of RGCs, and the potential differences in progenitor cell behavior between transgenic lines. As these findings highlight the possible differences in the contribution of cells to long-term neurogenesis in vivo, they indicate that the current models of hippocampal neurogenesis should be modified to include RGC lineage heterogeneity. (C) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available