4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Clinical Application of Measurement of Hippocampal Atrophy in Degenerative Dementias

Journal

HIPPOCAMPUS
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 510-516

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20617

Keywords

hippocampus; volume; atrophy rate; Alzheimer's; MRI

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0601846] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [G0601846] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Alzheimers Research UK [ART-RF2007-1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [G0601846] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10123] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hippocampal atrophy is a characteristic and early feature of Alzheimer's disease. Volumetry of the hippocampus using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used not only to assess hippocampal involvement in different neurodegenerative diseases as a potential diagnostic biomarker, but also to understand the natural history of diseases, and to track changes in volume over time. Assessing change in structure circumvents issues surrounding interindividual variability and allows assessment of disease progression. Disease-modifying effects of putative therapies are important to assess in clinical trials and are difficult using clinical scales. As a result, there is increasing use of serial MRI in trials to detect potential slowing of atrophy rates as an outcome measure. Automated and yet reliable methods of quantifying such change in the hippocampus would therefore be very valuable. Algorithms capable of measuring such changes automatically have been developed and may be applicable to predict decline to a diagnosis of dementia in the future. This article details the progress in using MRI to understand hippocampal changes in the degenerative dementias and also describes attempts to automate hippocampal segmentation in these diseases. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available