4.4 Article

Thermal stability and combustion behavior of flame-retardant polypropylene with thermoplastic polyurethane-microencapsulated ammonium polyphosphate

Journal

HIGH PERFORMANCE POLYMERS
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 445-454

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0954008313517910

Keywords

Polypropylene; ammonium polyphosphate; thermoplastic polyurethane; flame retardancy; thermal stability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51003088, 51373139]
  2. National Science and Technology Supporting Project Foundation of China [2007BAB08B05]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [SWJTU12CX009]
  4. Sishi Star Foundations of Southwest Jiaotong University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, thermoplastic polyurethane-microencapsulated ammonium polyphosphate (MTAPP) is prepared and well characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). MTAPP and APP are added onto polypropylene (PP) as a novel intumescent flame-retardant system to improve the flame retardancy of PP. The flammability, thermal stability, and mechanical properties of the flame-retardant PP composites are investigated by limiting oxygen index (LOI), UL-94 vertical burning test, cone calorimeter test (CCT), TGA, and mechanical properties tests. The results show that MTAPP exhibits better flame retardancy and thermal stability than that of the APP in the flame-retardant PP composites. The LOI value of the PP/MTAPP composite at the same loading level is higher than that of PP/APP composite. The dripping of MTAPP system disappears compared with APP system from UL-94 test. The results of the CCT also indicate that MTAPP is an effective flame retardant in PP. The improvement may be attributed to the better charring capacity of MTAPP from TGA. Additionally, the mechanical properties of MTAPP are better than those of APP in PP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available