4.7 Article

Workplace settings and wellbeing: Greenspace use and views contribute to employee wellbeing at peri-urban business sites

Journal

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages 32-40

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.004

Keywords

Science park; Workplace; Green space; Employee wellbeing; Restorative environments

Funding

  1. UK Economic and Social Research Council [ES/I902546/1]
  2. Scottish Government's Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services (RESAS) division
  3. ESRC [ES/I902546/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low density business developments are a near ubiquitous feature of peri-urban landscapes in the UK and in other developed countries, however little is known about how workers relate to open space in this particular type of working environment. Person-environment relationships in five urban fringe science parks in central Scotland were investigated through a survey of employees (N=366). Specifically, the study sought to explore the impact of viewing and using greenspace at these knowledge-sector work-places on employee wellbeing. The results of a series of multiple regression analyses indicated that both use of the open space and views of some vegetation types, namely trees, lawn and shrubs or flowering plants, were positively and independently associated with self-reported wellbeing levels. This research provides new insight into the extent to which workplace greenspace contributes to employee wellbeing, whilst controlling for exposure to greenspace outside of the workplace context. Also, by investigating relationships between wellbeing and the particular physical features seen in views, the research provides evidence on how workplaces might be designed to incorporate restorative window views. These findings have relevance both for the planning and design of peri-urban business sites and for the design of interventions to promote employee wellbeing. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available