4.6 Article

Environmental Factors Controlling Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in Two Contrasting Mediterranean Climatic Areas of Southern Spain

Journal

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 603-611

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2417

Keywords

carbon sequestration; soil geodatabase; soil management; land use changes; soil carbon sinks

Funding

  1. 'Consejeria de Medio Ambiente' of the Andalusian Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Managing soil carbon requires accurate estimates of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks and its dynamics, at scales able to capture the influence of local factors on the carbon pool. This paper develops a spatially explicit methodology to quantify SOC stocks in two contrasting regions of Southern Spain: Sierra Norte de Sevilla (SN) and Cabo de Gata (CG). Also, it examines the relationship between SOC stocks and local environmental factors. Results showed that mean SOC stocks were 43kgm(-2) in SN and 30kgm(-2) in CG. Differences in SOC in both sites were not significant, suggesting that factors other than climate have a greater influence on SOC stocks. A correlation matrix revealed that SOC has the highest positive correlation with clay content and soil depth. Based on the land use, the largest SOC stocks were found in grassland soils (44kgm(-2) in CG and 50kgm(-2) in SN) and extensive crops (30kgm(-2) in CG and 50kgm(-2) in SN), and the smallest under shrubs (28kgm(-2) in CG and 32kgm(-2) in SN) and forests soils (42kgm(-2) in SN). This SOC distribution is explained by the greatest soil depth under agricultural land uses, a common situation across the Mediterranean, where the deepest soils have been cultivated and natural vegetation mostly remains along the marginal sites. Accordingly, strategies to manage SOC stocks in southern Spain will have to acknowledge its high pedodiversity and long history of land use, refusing the adoption of standard global strategies. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available