4.3 Article

TAXONOIVIIC REVISION OF DESMOGNATHUS WRIGHTI (CAUDATA: PLETHODONTIDAE)

Journal

HERPETOLOGICA
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages 283-295

Publisher

HERPETOLOGISTS LEAGUE
DOI: 10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-09-00002.1

Keywords

Desmognathus organi; Desmognathus Ecological-niche modeling; Plethodontidae; Salamanders; Southern Appalachians; Systematics

Categories

Funding

  1. Environmental Research Institute of Vassar College
  2. NSF [IOS 08-18212, DBI 04-571, DEB 04-14033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We revise the taxonomic status of Desmognathus wright, which occurs in the southern Appalachians of western North Carolina, eastern Tennessee, and southwest Virginia. USA, based on a combination of genetic, ecological, ami morph( metric analyses Previously, we reported fixed differences in allozymic loci and mitochondrial DNA sequences between lineages geographically divided by the French Bread River basin at the level of species divergence Here, we show duet these.; two lineages also differ in ventral pigmentation and several measures of body size, including snout-vent length, body condition and head width In addition, spatially explicit ecological-niche analyses of climate at more than 400 collection localities spanning the range of wright indicate that the lineages separated by the French 13 road River are in unique environmental niche space Ecological niche models resolved that population localities north of the river were generally colder and drier than localities to the south, which suggests that divergent selection pressures may exist, in addition to isolation by distance, to drive the diversification of these two lineages The name Desmognathus wright (King, 1936), for which the type locality is Mt LeConte within the Great Smoky Mountains, Tennessee, was retained for all populations south and west of the French Broad River, while the name D organi, with type locality at Whitetop Mountain, Virginia, was given to those populations north and east of the river

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available