4.5 Article

Extremely reduced dispersal and gene flow in an island bird

Journal

HEREDITY
Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages 190-196

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2013.91

Keywords

Mascarene islands; Reunion; white-eye; Zosterops; microsatellites; population differentiation

Funding

  1. MESR (Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche)
  2. Agence Francaise pour le Developpement
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversite (FRB) through its Centre for Synthesis and Analysis of Biodiversity (CESAB)
  4. 'Laboratoire d'Excellence' TULIP [ANR-10-LABX-41]
  5. SYNTHESYS Project
  6. European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP7 'Capacities' Programme at the Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC) of Madrid, Spain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Reunion grey white-eye, Zosterops borbonicus, a passerine bird endemic to Reunion Island in the Mascarene archipelago, represents an extreme case of microgeographical plumage colour variation in birds, with four distinct colour forms occupying different parts of this small island (2512 km(2)). To understand whether such population differentiation may reflect low levels of dispersal and gene flow at a very small spatial scale, we examined population structure and gene flow by analysing variation at 11 microsatellite loci among four geographically close localities (<26 km apart) sampled within the distribution range of one of the colour forms, the brown-headed brown form. Our results revealed levels of genetic differentiation that are exceptionally high for birds at such a small spatial scale. This strong population structure appears to reflect low levels of historical and contemporary gene flow among populations, unless very close geographically (<10 km). Thus, we suggest that the Reunion grey white-eye shows an extremely reduced propensity to disperse, which is likely to be related to behavioural processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available