4.5 Article

Homoeologous chromosomes of Xenopus laevis are highly conserved after whole-genome duplication

Journal

HEREDITY
Volume 111, Issue 5, Pages 430-436

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2013.65

Keywords

Xenopus laevis; Xenopus tropicalis; comparative gene mapping; FISH; whole-genome duplication; homoeologous chromosomes

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan [23113004, 22370081]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22370081, 24770226] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been suggested that whole-genome duplication (WGD) occurred twice during the evolutionary process of vertebrates around 450 and 500 million years ago, which contributed to an increase in the genomic and phenotypic complexities of vertebrates. However, little is still known about the evolutionary process of homoeologous chromosomes after WGD because many duplicate genes have been lost. Therefore, Xenopus laevis (2n = 36) and Xenopus (Silurana) tropicalis (2n = 20) are good animal models for studying the process of genomic and chromosomal reorganization after WGD because X. laevis is an allotetraploid species that resulted from WGD after the interspecific hybridization of diploid species closely related to X. tropicalis. We constructed a comparative cytogenetic map of X. laevis using 60 complimentary DNA clones that covered the entire chromosomal regions of 10 pairs of X. tropicalis chromosomes. We consequently identified all nine homoeologous chromosome groups of X. laevis. Hybridization signals on two pairs of X. laevis homoeologous chromosomes were detected for 50 of 60 (83%) genes, and the genetic linkage is highly conserved between X. tropicalis and X. laevis chromosomes except for one fusion and one inversion and also between X. laevis homoeologous chromosomes except for two inversions. These results indicate that the loss of duplicated genes and inter- and/or intrachromosomal rearrangements occurred much less frequently in this lineage, suggesting that these events were not essential for diploidization of the allotetraploid genome in X. laevis after WGD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available