4.5 Article

Estimation of effective population size in continuously distributed populations: there goes the neighborhood

Journal

HEREDITY
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages 189-199

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2013.37

Keywords

genetic monitoring; inbreeding; isolation-by-distance; linkage disequilibrium; wahlund effect; wright's neighborhood

Funding

  1. National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NSF) [EF-0423641]
  2. National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
  3. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [DEB-0553768]
  4. University of California, Santa Barbara
  5. State of California
  6. Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Use of genetic methods to estimate effective population size (N-e) is rapidly increasing, but all approaches make simplifying assumptions unlikely to be met in real populations. In particular, all assume a single, unstructured population, and none has been evaluated for use with continuously distributed species. We simulated continuous populations with local mating structure, as envisioned by Wright's concept of neighborhood size (NS), and evaluated performance of a single-sample estimator based on linkage disequilibrium (LD), which provides an estimate of the effective number of parents that produced the sample (N-b). Results illustrate the interacting effects of two phenomena, drift and mixture, that contribute to LD. Samples from areas equal to or smaller than a breeding window produced estimates close to the NS. As the sampling window increased in size to encompass multiple genetic neighborhoods, mixture LD from a two-locus Wahlund effect overwhelmed the reduction in drift LD from incorporating offspring from more parents. As a consequence, (N) over cap (b) never approached the global N-e, even when the geographic scale of sampling was large. Results indicate that caution is needed in applying standard methods for estimating effective size to continuously distributed populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available