4.5 Article

Chicken domestication: an updated perspective based on mitochondrial genomes

Journal

HEREDITY
Volume 110, Issue 3, Pages 277-282

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2012.83

Keywords

chicken; mtDNA; domestication; phylogeny; Austronesian

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2007CB815704]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U0836602, 31061160189, 30660024]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province, China [2007C0003Z, 2006C0034M]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant [A3148]
  6. CAS-TWAS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Domestic chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) fulfill various roles ranging from food and entertainment to religion and ornamentation. To survey its genetic diversity and trace the history of domestication, we investigated a total of 4938 mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) fragments including 2843 previously published and 2095 de novo units from 2044 domestic chickens and 51 red junglefowl (Gallus gallus). To obtain the highest possible level of molecular resolution, 50 representative samples were further selected for total mtDNA genome sequencing. A fine-gained mtDNA phylogeny was investigated by defining haplogroups A-I and W-Z. Common haplogroups A-G were shared by domestic chickens and red junglefowl. Rare haplogroups H-I and W-Z were specific to domestic chickens and red junglefowl, respectively. We re-evaluated the global mtDNA profiles of chickens. The geographic distribution for each of major haplogroups was examined. Our results revealed new complexities of history in chicken domestication because in the phylogeny lineages from the red junglefowl were mingled with those of the domestic chickens. Several local domestication events in South Asia, Southwest China and Southeast Asia were identified. The assessment of chicken mtDNA data also facilitated our understanding about the Austronesian settlement in the Pacific. Heredity (2013) 110, 277-282; doi:10.1038/hdy.2012.83; published online 5 December 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available