4.5 Article

Demographic and genetic factors shaping contemporary metapopulation effective size and its empirical estimation in salmonid fish

Journal

HEREDITY
Volume 107, Issue 5, Pages 444-455

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2011.31

Keywords

metapopulation; gene flow; Atlantic salmon; Gadus morhua; gasterosteus aculeatus; marine fish

Funding

  1. NSERC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The preservation of biodiversity requires an understanding of the maintenance of its components, including genetic diversity. Effective population size determines the amount of genetic variance maintained in populations, but its estimation can be complex, especially when populations are interconnected in a metapopulation. Theory predicts that the effective size of a metapopulation (meta-N-e) can be decreased or increased by population subdivision, but little empirical work has evaluated these predictions. Here, we use neutral genetic markers and simulations to estimate the effective size of a putative metapopulation in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). For a weakly structured set of rivers, we find that meta-N-e is similar to the sum of local deme sizes, whereas higher genetic differentiation among demes dramatically reduces meta-N-e estimates. Interdemic demographic processes, such as asymmetrical gene flow, may explain this pattern. However, simulations also suggest that unrecognized population subdivision can also introduce downward bias into empirical estimation, emphasizing the importance of identifying the proper scale of distinct demographic and genetic processes. Under natural patterns of connectivity, evolutionary potential may generally be maintained at higher levels than the local population, with implications for conservation given ongoing species declines and habitat fragmentation. Heredity (2011) 107, 444-455; doi:10.1038/hdy.2011.31; published online 27 April 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available