4.5 Article

Genetic divergence, range expansion and possible homoploid hybrid speciation among pine species in Northeast China

Journal

HEREDITY
Volume 108, Issue 5, Pages 552-562

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2011.123

Keywords

homoploid hybrid speciation; interspecific divergence; Pinus; range expansion

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30725004]
  2. Ministry of Education of China
  3. Royal Society-NSF China [2010/R4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although homoploid hybrid speciation in plants is probably more common than previously realized, there are few well-documented cases of homoploid hybrid origin in conifers. We examined genetic divergence between two currently widespread pines in Northeast China, Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica and Pinus densiflora, and also whether two narrowly distributed pines in the same region, Pinus funebris and Pinus takahasii, might have originated from the two widespread species by homoploid hybrid speciation. Our results, based on population genetic analysis of chloroplast (cp), mitochondrial (mt) DNA, and nuclear gene sequence variation, showed that the two widespread species were divergent for both cp- and mtDNA variation, and also for haplotype variation at two of eight nuclear gene loci surveyed. Our analysis further indicated that P. sylvestris var. mongolica and P. densiflora remained allopatric during the most severe Quaternary glacial period that occurred in Northeast China, but subsequently exhibited rapid range expansions. P. funebris and P. takahasii, were found to contain a mixture of chlorotypes and nuclear haplotypes that distinguish P. sylvestris var. mongolica and P. densiflora, in support of the hypothesis that they possibly originated via homoploid hybrid speciation following secondary contact and hybridization between P. sylvestris var. mongolica and P. densiflora. Heredity (2012) 108, 552-562; doi:10.1038/hdy.2011.123; published online 21 December 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available