4.5 Article

Inbred decorated crickets exhibit higher measures of macroparasitic immunity than outbred individuals

Journal

HEREDITY
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages 282-289

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2010.1

Keywords

crickets; genetic correlations; heritability; inbreeding depression; immunity; sexual conflict

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-0543254, IOS-0718140]
  2. Royal Society
  3. Illinois State University
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/B501398/2] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inbreeding is assumed to have negative effects on fitness, including the reduced ability to withstand immune challenges. We examined the immunological consequences of inbreeding in decorated crickets, Gryllodes sigillatus, by comparing lytic activity, phenoloxidase (PO) activity, and encapsulation ability of crickets from eight inbred lines with that of crickets from the outbred founder population. Surprisingly, crickets from inbred lines had a greater encapsulation ability compared with crickets from the outbred population. We suggest that because inbred crickets have reduced reproductive effort, they may, therefore, have the option of devoting more resources to this form of immunity than outbred individuals. We also found that both inbred and outbred females had higher immunity than males in PO activity and implant darkness. This result supports the hypothesis that females should devote more effort to somatic maintenance and immunity than males. PO activity and implant darkness were heritable in both males and females, but lytic activity was only heritable in females. Males and females differed in the heritability of, and genetic correlations among, immune traits, suggesting that differences in selective pressures on males and females may have resulted in a sexual conflict over optimal immune trait values. Heredity (2010) 105, 282-289; doi:10.1038/hdy.2010.1; published online 3 February 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available