4.5 Article

Genetic structure and contrasting selection pattern at two major histocompatibility complex genes in wild house mouse populations

Journal

HEREDITY
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages 727-740

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2010.112

Keywords

MHC; house mouse; selection; population structure; trans-species polymorphism

Funding

  1. Grant Agency of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [IAA600930608]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [206/08/0640]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mammalian major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is a tightly linked cluster of immune genes, and is often thought of as inherited as a unit. This has led to the hope that studying a single MHC gene will reveal patterns of evolution representative of the MHC as a whole. In this study we analyse a 1000-km transect of MHC variation traversing the European house mouse hybrid zone to compare signals of selection and patterns of diversification at two closely linked MHC class II genes, H-2Aa and H-2Eb. We show that although they are 0.01cM apart (that is, recombination is expected only once in 10 000 meioses), disparate evolutionary patterns were detected. H-2Aa shows higher allelic polymorphism, faster allelic turnover due to higher mutation rates, stronger positive selection at antigen-binding sites and higher population structuring than H-2Eb. H-2Eb alleles are maintained in the gene pool for longer, including over separation of the subspecies, some H-2Eb alleles are positively and others negatively selected and some of the alleles are not expressed. We conclude that studies on MHC genes in wild-living vertebrates can give substantially different results depending on the MHC gene examined and that the level of polymorphism in a related species is a poor criterion for gene choice. Heredity (2011) 106, 727-740; doi:10.1038/hdy.2010.112; published online 8 September 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available