4.5 Article

Clinical outcome and prognostic factors of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and extrahepatic metastasis treated with sorafenib

Journal

HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 13, Pages 1320-1328

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12307

Keywords

extrahepatic metastasis; hepatocellular carcinoma; intrahepatic tumor stage; sorafenib

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25670369] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimThe purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcome and identify prognostic factors following treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and extrahepatic metastasis with sorafenib. MethodsSixty-one HCC patients with extrahepatic metastasis who were treated with sorafenib were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. ResultsThe median survival time (MST) of all patients was 11months. The median time to radiological progression was 4.2months. The response rates (complete response [CR]+partial response [PR]) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified RECIST were 3.0% and 8.0%, respectively, while the disease control rates (CR+PR+stable disease) were 49% and 49%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified T factor (intrahepatic tumor stage, T 0-2), response to disease control and des--carboxy prothrombin (<2600mAU/mL) as significant and independent determinants of survival. Intrahepatic tumor stage before treatment allows stratification of prognosis of patients treated with sorafenib. Four T0 patients remained alive. The MST of patients with T1 (n=6), T2 (n=10), T3 (n=23) and T4 (n=18) of intrahepatic tumor stage was 20, 23, 7 and 5months, respectively. Among the progressive disease group, patients with T0-2 intrahepatic tumor stage had better prognosis than patients with T3-4. ConclusionIn HCC patients with extrahepatic metastasis who are treated with sorafenib, intrahepatic tumor stage was a significant and independent prognostic factor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available