4.5 Article

Adjuvant interferon therapy after surgical treatment for hepatitis B/C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

Journal

HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 209-217

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12109

Keywords

hepatitis B virus; hepatitis C virus; hepatocellular carcinoma; interferon; surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimThis meta-analysis aimed to determine whether interferon (IFN) therapy could improve clinical effects of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV)or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection-related primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgery. MethodsAn electronic search from January 1998 to December 2012 was conducted to identify comparative studies evaluating IFN therapy on recurrence and survival after surgical treatment of HCC. ResultsThe estimated odds ratios (OR) for the 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of HBV-related HCC were 3.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-6.27), 2.36 (95% CI, 1.45-3.83), 1.81 (95% CI, 1.21-2.72) and 1.93 (95% CI, 1.35-2.75), respectively; and the OR for the 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year recurrence rates were 0.63 (95% CI, 0.44-0.91), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.60-1.18), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.63-1.22) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.56-1.07), respectively. The overall survival rates of HCV-related HCC were significantly higher in IFN groups than in control groups at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 0.96-4.55; OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.01-2.89; OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.09-2.83; and OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.97-4.65, respectively); and the recurrence rates of IFN groups were lower than control groups at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.92; OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.41-0.81; OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.80; and OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36-0.75, respectively). ConclusionIn conclusion, IFN therapy in this meta-analysis shows a significant clinical effect in postoperative patients of HCC, particularly in HCV-related HCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available