4.5 Article

Detection of hepatitis C virus natural recombinant RF1_2k/1b strain among intravenous drug users in Uzbekistan

Journal

HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 457-464

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00293.x

Keywords

2k/1b; HCV genotyping; HCV; natural recombination

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: A series of recent studies have indicated the presence of natural intergenotypic recombinant hepatitis C virus (HCV) strains in distinct parts of the world. The majority of the current genotyping methods are based on analysis of either 5'UTR, structural (Core/E1/E2) or non-structural (NS5B) genomic regions of the virus. Methods: In the present study, based on both structural and non-structural regions, we determined the genotype of 55 anti-HCV-positive intravenous drug users (IDUs) in Uzbekistan. Results: HCV-3a (67.3%) was the most prevalent genotype in this cohort, followed by HCV-1b (27.3%). A discrepancy in results was observed between structural and non-structural regions in one case (1.8%). Phylogenetically this strain was related to the previously reported RF1_2k/1b variant. Based on accumulated sequences, specific primers were designed for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) spanning the tentative intergenotypic crossover point of RF1_2k/1b. The sensitivity and specificity of the method were assessed using generated template clones of HCV-1b, 2a, 2 k and RF1_2k/1b. The method was applied to 55 cases in the present study and only one case showed a positive result, indicating that in these individuals, the variant is not present as a minor quasispecies clone. Conclusion: In conclusion, the finding of RF1_2k/1b in Central Asia indicates that the variant has wide geographic distribution. The PCR-based screening method developed in this study should be useful in further epidemiological and clinical studies on the recombination phenomenon in HCV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available