4.6 Review

Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: a 2008 update

Journal

HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 263-283

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12072-008-9080-3

Keywords

chronic hepatitis B; liver cirrhosis; hepatocellular carcinoma; hepatitis B virus (HBV); interferon-alpha; Pegylated interferon; lamivudine; adefovir; entecavir; telbivudine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large amounts of new data on the natural history and treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have become available since 2005. These include long-term follow-up studies in large community-based cohorts or asymptomatic subjects with chronic HBV infection, further studies on the role of HBV genotype/naturally occurring HBV mutations, treatment of drug resistance and new therapies. In addition, Pegylated interferon alpha 2a, entecavir and telbivudine have been approved globally. To update HBV management guidelines, relevant new data were reviewed and assessed by experts from the region, and the significance of the reported findings were discussed and debated. The earlier Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B was revised accordingly. The key terms used in the statement were also defined. The new guidelines include general management, special indications for liver biopsy in patients with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase, time to start or stop drug therapy, choice of drug to initiate therapy, when and how to monitor the patients during and after stopping drug therapy. Recommendations on the therapy of patients in special circumstances, including women in childbearing age, patients with antiviral drug resistance, concurrent viral infection, hepatic decompensation, patients receiving immune-suppressive medications or chemotherapy and patients in the setting of liver transplantation, are also included.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available