4.6 Review

A review of the one-year incidence of resistance to lamivudine in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Journal

HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 440-456

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12072-008-9105-y

Keywords

Chronic hepatitis B; Hepatitis B virus; Lamivudine; Resistance; Virological resistance; Antiviral resistance; Genotypic resistance; Phenotypic resistance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of antiviral resistance is a recognized challenge to successful treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but it has been difficult to establish an accurate estimate of its incidence due to a number of factors: (a) lack of an accepted definition of antiviral resistance; (b) lack of a standardized assay to assess resistance; and (c) lack of consensus on patient selection criteria for resistance testing. Lamivudine, an effective and well-established antiviral agent, has been reported to show one-year resistance rates in CHB ranging from 6% to 32%, but methodologies used to calculate these rates vary considerably. This article reviews the clinical, statistical, and laboratory methodologies of clinical studies reporting one-year rates of antiviral resistance to lamivudine in CHB. Studies reporting one-year resistance rates to lamivudine in CHB were analyzed for methodologic differences and their influence on reported resistance rates. Studies using only a genotypic definition of resistance reported one-year rates ranging from 14% to 32%. Studies assessing genotypic resistance in patients with evidence of virologic breakthrough reported much lower one-year resistance rates of 6.4-15.4%. It is important when comparing resistance rates to antiviral drugs in CHB to consider the methodology and definition of resistance used because this can dramatically influence the results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available