4.8 Article

Endothelial Cell Toll-Like Receptor 4 Regulates Fibrosis-Associated Angiogenesis in the Liver

Journal

HEPATOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 590-601

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hep.23739

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL 86990, R01 HL086990-03, R01 HL086990] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK059615, R01 DK 59615, P30 DK 084567, R01 DK059615-07, P30 DK084567-016279, P30 DK084567] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Angiogenesis defines the growth of new blood vessels from preexisting vascular endothelial networks and corresponds to the wound healing process that is typified by the process of liver fibrosis. Liver fibrosis is also associated with increased endotoxin within the gut lumen and its associated portal circulation. However, the interrelationship of gut endotoxin and its receptor, toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), with liver fibrosis and associated angiogenesis remains incompletely defined. Here, using complementary genetic, molecular, and pharmacological approaches, we provide evidence that the pattern recognition receptor that recognizes endotoxin, TLR4, which is expressed on liver endothelial cells (LECs), regulates angiogenic responses both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistic studies have revealed a key role for a cognate TLR4 effector protein, myeloid differentiation protein 88 (MyD88), in this process, which culminates in extracellular protease production that regulates the invasive capacity of LECs, a key step in angiogenesis. Furthermore, TLR4-dependent angiogenesis in vivo corresponds to fibrosis in complementary liver models of fibrosis. Conclusion: These studies provide evidence that the TLR4 pathway in LECs regulates angiogenesis through its MyD88 effector protein by regulating extracellular protease production and that this process is linked to the development of liver fibrosis. (HEPATOLOGY 2010;52:590-601)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available