4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ADMINISTRATION OF ORAL IRON CHELATOR DEFERIPRONE IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME

Journal

HEMOGLOBIN
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 217-227

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/03630269.2011.578515

Keywords

Iron overload; Myelodysplasia syndrome (MDS); Deferiprone (L1); Treatment; Ferritin; Agranulocytosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Forty-eight patients with early myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) without excess of blasts, with average initial serum ferritin levels of 2739.5 mu g/L (range 825-11287 mu g/L), were treated with deferiprone (L1) in a daily dose of 40-90 mg/kg. Median duration of chelation treatment was 10.9 months (range 4-24 months). Chelation was effective (maintained or decreased iron stores) in 16 out of 22 patients (73%) with serum ferritin levels <2000 mu g/L in contrast to only 12 out of 26 patients with serum ferritin levels >2000 mu g/L. Combination of L1 with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) (30-40 kU/week) resulted in effective chelation in five additional patients with serum ferritin levels >3000 mu g/L. Incidence of adverse effects was comparable to that in thalassemic patients. Gastrointestinal symptoms represented the most frequent adverse effect of L1 therapy (37.5% of patients) that limited an effective escalation of the daily dose of the drug and led to discontinuation of the treatment for six patients. A decreased number of granulocytes was observed in five (13%) patients and agranulocytosis occurred in two patients (4%). Granulocyte counts were restored after cessation of L1 treatment and administration of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in all but one patient. Administration of L1 in a daily dose of at least 75 mg/kg may represent an alternative approach in treatment of mild and moderate iron overload in MDS patients who cannot be treated with deferasirox (DFRA) or deferoxamine (DFO).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available