4.8 Article

Stable coronary artery disease: revascularisation and invasive strategies

Journal

LANCET
Volume 386, Issue 9994, Pages 702-713

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61220-X

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Italian Society of Cardiology
  2. Umberto Veronesi Foundation
  3. Abbott Laboratories
  4. Biotronik
  5. Boston Scientific
  6. Edwards Lifesciences
  7. Medtronic
  8. Medicines Company
  9. St Jude
  10. AstraZeneca
  11. Eli Lilly
  12. Bayer
  13. Biosensors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stable coronary artery disease is the most common clinical manifestation of ischaemic heart disease and a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Myocardial revascularisation is a mainstay in the treatment of symptomatic patients or those with ischaemia-producing coronary lesions, and reduces ischaemia to a greater extent than medical treatment. Documentation of ischaemia and plaque burden is fundamental in the risk stratification of patients with stable coronary artery disease, and several invasive and non-invasive techniques are available (eg, fractional flow reserve or intravascular ultrasound) or being validated (eg, instantaneous wave-free ratio and optical coherence tomography). The use of new-generation drug-eluting stents and arterial conduits greatly improve clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). PCI is feasible, safe, and effective in many patients with stable coronary artery disease who remain symptomatic despite medical treatment. In patients with multivessel and left main coronary artery disease, the decision between PCI or CABG is guided by the local Heart Team (team of different cardiovascular specialists, including non-invasive and invasive cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons), who carefully judge the possible benefits and risks inherent to PCI and CABG. In specific subsets, such as patients with diabetes and advanced, multivessel coronary artery disease, CABG remains the standard of care in view of improved protection against recurrent ischaemic adverse events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available